Download disabled

Please respect their decision and desist from requesting license changes in the comments.

If you would like to use the FontStruction for a specific project, you may be able to contact the designer directly about obtaining a license.

Based on Claredont, featuring the new slightly improved S and some added glyphs.

Info:	Created on 30th December 2010 . Last edited on 6th November 2011.
License	Creative Commons
Categories:	Slab Serif Stencil
Sets:
Tags:	Clarendon (5) Slab (211) Stencil (612) Western European (1) Diacritics (16) Latin Extended (38) Capital Eszett (4)
Fave Tags:	-

14 Comments

Comment by riccard0 6th November 2011

Awesomeness to the 10th! :)

Comment by William Leverette (will.i.ૐ) 6th November 2011

Great font, riccard0!

Comment by elmoyenique 6th November 2011

Excellent!

Comment by laynecom 6th November 2011

Great work. 10/10

Comment by Frodo7 6th November 2011

A great new take on an already fantastic font. 10/10

Comment by p2pnut 7th November 2011

I’m but a poor lazy student of the craft, while you’re the real masters!

Comment by riccard0 7th November 2011

What a remarkable demo picture!

Comment by Frodo7 7th November 2011

Congratulations! FontStruct Staff have deemed your FontStruction worthy of special mention. “Claredont Stencil” is now a Top Pick.

Comment by Rob Meek (meek) 8th November 2011

Very awesome.

Comment by thalamic 2nd December 2011

Were the capitals perhaps inspired by my font Wanted 2.0?

Comment by Agent Demonic Ladybug 3rd December 2011

@Agent-D-L. Ha ha. Very cocky. You're joking right? This is based on http://fontstruct.com/fontstructions/show/claredont which was designed in December 2010. Some 6 and a half months before you did your 'perhaps inspired' by version of it.

Comment by djnippa 3rd December 2011

Thank you Thalamic and Nippa :-)
ADL, I think we both were inspired by the historical lettershapes of Clarendon, a style popularised, among other things, by the wild west “WANTED” bounty posters. The intrinsic limitations of Fonstruct in reproducing such shapes could have led to further similarities. That said, looking at your font, I think we choose quite different stylistic approaches and solutions (terminals and serifs, for example).

Comment by riccard0 4th December 2011

True. Yours IS quite different.

Comment by Agent Demonic Ladybug 6th December 2011