Download disabled
The designer of this FontStruction has chosen not to make it available for download from this website by choosing an “All Rights Reserved" license.
Please respect their decision and desist from requesting license changes in the comments.
If you would like to use the FontStruction for a specific project, you may be able to contact the designer directly about obtaining a license.
Another Art Nouveau venture, wanted to take a more earnest look and study into the adjoining arts and craft/craftsman genres. Please enjoy
11 Comments
Only thing to add to this jewel is the word, stunning!
This font is absolutely amazing, but I did notice a small problem. In the word gym(along with a couple others), the lowercase g overlaps with the y. Otherwise, an immediate favorite.
Many thanks for the kind words Sed4tives, Elmoyenique & Gr4ftY~
There has since been a skosh of kerning to remedy the overlap
Although the overlap with the kern touch has been avoided a little, the rubbing between the "g" and the "y" still seems a little annoying to me. I dare suggest that you consider an alternative "y" (although it breaks the aesthetics of the descendants a bit) to use only in this pair of "gy" glyphs. I've made two slightly different proposals to see it.
It happens with the word logjam, plus three other letter pairs. Although gq isn't used in English, gp and gg are (pigpen, egg, exaggerate, rugged, and so on). Make sure that jg, pg, qg, and yg are checked as well.
I wonder if an alt g that uses the same bottom as on the j,y, and the same top as q is possible?
Many thanks for your diligence in helping with this, the samples are quite a boon! Over the next bit of days I'll work to incorporate these examples as special characters for use in those particular words. Wishful thinking that this will help remedy the hiccup and to not stray from the original font~
Alternatives for both "y" and "g" utilizing Elmoyenique and BWM's ideas have been incorporated. They can be found as "lowercase y with hook" and "lowercase g with hook" respectively (seemed both fitting and a literal description of the glyphs). Once again, many thanks for the help :)
Please sign in to comment.