Download disabled

Please respect their decision and desist from requesting license changes in the comments.

If you would like to use the FontStruction for a specific project, you may be able to contact the designer directly about obtaining a license.

Info:

Created on 31st July 2008. Last edited on 22nd June 2009.
License:

Creative Commons
Categories:
- Picture/Symbol
Sets:
- Heavy
Tag:
- -
Fave Tags:
- -

17 Comments

I don't get it. Rectangles?

Comment by thalamic 31st july 2008

FS STAFF

This is mostly a novelty FontStruction, but I found it amusing. See definition two on this page.

Comment by Stephen Coles (Stewf) 31st july 2008

I guess the redactions are the character weight which the Gubmint has deemed obscene.

Comment by intaglio 31st july 2008

The best i have seen in a long while at fontstruct.
Says everything.
10 points by me.
@ minimum - this is hard to minimalize, down, under below ...

Comment by prototype 12th june 2009

A hidden gem of early fontstructing. Minimalism taken to the extreme. It's not the most legible font, perhaps, but the spacing is perfect.

An old motto comes to my mind: You can not not communicate.

Comment by Frodo7 8th december 2009

???

Comment by balete 10th april 2011

How on Earth do u read this??

Comment by anonymous-479865 10th may 2012

@prototype: ur SO weird! :)

Comment by anonymous-479865 10th may 2012

???

How are you supposed to read it?

-Mairi

Comment by Mairi 18th december 2012

I really like this, but I think the spaces and gaps should be black too, otherwise it's kinda revealing. This is pure brilliance though. The best part in my opinion is that this font still has real information stored as letters, meaning everything written with it can be decoded by simply changing the font. This is especially useful for when you want to write up a classified document digitally without having to swap out the information with meaningless boxes... Just change the font and boom!
Of course, you'll have to stop people from being able to copy-paste the text, but that's not too hard.

Comment by Ghosty 29th april 2013