The designer of this FontStruction has chosen not to make it available for download from this website by choosing an “All Rights Reserved" license.
Please respect their decision and desist from requesting license changes in the comments.
If you would like to use the FontStruction for a specific project, you may be able to contact the designer directly about obtaining a license.
11 Comments
You have that great sense for crafting these rigid super usable fonts. This one evolves around a somewhat slight more simplified squarish letter geometry than what you normally create, but despite that, when zooming in I notice there is more than meets the eye, such as nice rounded finishing touches on the concaves.
You managed to achieve a pleasant contrast ratio and kept everything tight and consistent. I just have a tiny bit of criticism as to the size of your Asterisk, or actually for it's lack of sufficient comparable size / bulk in relation to the other characters in your font. This is somewhat personal, but in my opinion it would benefit from being slightly bigger than it currently is. Apart from this it's a rock solid design.
I didn't realized it at first, but kind of cool to see that this font has some similar design choices as were also made in one of my fonts JS-SANS ROUNDED. I'm pretty sure that this is coincidental, but nice to see different people making similar choices.
Thank you! The resemblance to your font is coincidental, but you've also done a great job with it.
I updated the asterisk and made it slightly bigger.
I wonder how you pulled off a perfect 90 degree angle on the slanted rectangles of the asterisk?
@BWM: What 90 degree angle? The only part of his Asterisk that is qualifying as a 90 degree element is the upright stroke, but this isn't connecting to any of the Asterisk's other elements in a 90 degree fashion. Am I missing something here? 😁
@STF This is what I was talking about (image rotated 26.5° clockwise)
@BWM: Ah yeah now I follow, to achieve that isn't all to difficult though. 😉
@Bryndan W. Meyerholt (BWM) - I'd guess careful use of the 30°–60°–90° triangle bricks.
@BWM like this. The strokes aren't at a perfect 60° angle but close enough
❤️!
Retro cool
Please sign in to comment.